Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Tim Booth's avatar

Thank you Nathan for your clear and compelling commentary. I've only just discovered your work, and I expect many more kiwis will over the coming days and weeks as they look for information on the present energy crisis. Whether it's a true SHTF moment or just another jolt that gets us thinking more clearly about the inevitable changes to come in energy use and access, I'm glad to have found a sane voice narrating the chaos as it unfolds.

I was intrigued by the notion of a tradable energy quota, which I was not familiar with. It seems very sensible at a policy level, but at a cultural level it will surely prove confronting - for our culture today at least. Until there's been a broader shift in cultural norms and related economic expectations, I think TEQs will be a very hard sell.

After a little reading on the topic of TEQs I discovered their association with the work of David Fleming, who's lean logic I'd come across a while back at a time when I'd started really fretting about the future. This link to Fleming was helpful context for me. I think policy needs to be placed within a broader philosophical (ideological?) arch to gain real traction. So maybe situating TEQs within a suite of sensible policy options that would help cushion energy declines? Hard to capture in a press realise of course.

Good luck to you, and thank you for your efforts on all this

Shane's avatar

Appreciate the update. The government paralysis is disconcerting.

5 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?