a critique from the vital perspectives of the energy cost of energy (ECoE), biophysical limits, and the realities of the coming age of energy disruptions
Thanks for the comprehensive review. Thanks for introducing the need to consider the energy the system gets out vs the energy it uses. Most numbers are less than 100, with thorium it can be greater than 2000.
An extraordinarily well-documented critique of the Regulatory Standards Bill (RSB) 2025 that every citizen should take the time to review. It would be an understatement to say that Nathan's due diligence is to be commended.
Nathan this video may help you explain the energy blind time blind vulnerability of life on your island. View it. If it helps us it. I have many more and I will continue helping you.
Civilization's Predicament and the unwinding behavior
Wow Nathan. Blow my mind, why don't you ...
Thanks for this
Thanks for the comprehensive review. Thanks for introducing the need to consider the energy the system gets out vs the energy it uses. Most numbers are less than 100, with thorium it can be greater than 2000.
An extraordinarily well-documented critique of the Regulatory Standards Bill (RSB) 2025 that every citizen should take the time to review. It would be an understatement to say that Nathan's due diligence is to be commended.
Nathan this video may help you explain the energy blind time blind vulnerability of life on your island. View it. If it helps us it. I have many more and I will continue helping you.
Civilization's Predicament and the unwinding behavior
https://lite.evernote.com/note/ee411e1c-c69e-5e16-c340-c6d87c523fec
Jack alpert
Jack
Jack Alpert PhD Director:
Stanford Knowledge Integration Laboratory
http://www.skil.org
(C) 913 708 2554
jackalpert@me.com
600 word summary of Jacks work
https://www.evernote.com/l/AAmZY0Hicy9KbLmuRpZRVAjtdR3UQC_bhEE